Conservation Scientists

Life, Physical, and Social Science
0%
AI Risk
47% AI risk — Medium risk level
Moderate Risk
47% • Medium exposure
Based on task-level analysis (O*NET)

AI Impact Assessment

This job may see some changes due to AI, but human skills remain important.

Conservation Scientists with an AI automation risk score of 47%. Analysis includes 30 core tasks.

Safer Career Paths

Browse more

Key Tasks

Analyze results of investigations to determine measures needed to maintain or restore proper soil management.

Risk: 75%

Review proposed wetland restoration easements or provide technical recommendations.

Risk: 83%

Review grant applications or make funding recommendations.

Risk: 83%

Visit areas affected by erosion problems to identify causes or determine solutions.

Risk: 69%

Review or approve amendments to comprehensive local water plans or conservation district plans.

Risk: 83%

Monitor projects during or after construction to ensure projects conform to design specifications.

Risk: 83%

Compile or interpret biodata to determine extent or type of wetlands or to aid in program formulation.

Risk: 82%

Gather information from geographic information systems (GIS) databases or applications to formulate land use recommendations.

Risk: 64%

Upskilling Courses

Data Sources

Analysis based on O*NET data

Method: rule+context+activity+calibration
Conservation Scientists — AI Risk 47% | IMJS